|
planorganic.com
Articles updated
April 2004 Email
me:
Organic
Matters - bi-monthly magazine of the Irish Organic Farmers and Growers
Association. Articles, by Jim O'Connor:
Nov/Dec 2002
Sept/Oct 2002
July/August 2002
May/June 2002
March/April 2002 Jan/Feb
2002
Nov/Dec
2001 Sept/Oct 2001
July/August 2001
Johannesburg Summit 2002.
Grace Maher, a lecturer at the Irish Organic College, Limerick reports
from the Summit (to which she traveled at her own expense) in an article
entitled, Agriculture and the World Summit on Sustainable
Development.
Organic
Attacks Dr. Angela Ryan answers point-by-point the spurious
arguments put forward by Prof "Tony" Trewavas and Sir John Krebs
and others.
Organic can feed the world - by
Calofornian academic, Christos
Vasilikiotis. The link to this important article had corrupted. This is
the latest 14th April 2004 http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/~christos/articles/cv_organic_farming.html
Genetically
engineered bull. My letter in 1999 replying to claims that organic
farming was a major threat against biodiversity and that organic potatoes
are poisonous.
Sustainable
agriculture can feed the world, not GM crops says Prince Charles, reported
by John Vidal, The Guardian, Jan 16 th 2001. The Hi-tech road is not for
800 million starving who cannot even remotely afford GM crops -
sustainable farming however is producing "astonishing
results". www.purefood.org/gefood/sustainableprince.cfm
Killing Fields This
is an essay I wrote four years ago that was widely distributed to the media
and politicians. I also delivered it as a talk at a Growing Awareness
conference in Co.Cork.
Messers,
visionaries
and organobureaucrats : dilemmas of institutionalisation in the Irish
organic farming movement. By Hilary Tovey. Published in Irish Journal of
Sociology, Vol. 9, 1999, pp. 31-59.
Organic
farming background A potted history of organic farming
Defining
farming systems An attempt to clarify what is meant by
Traditional, Sustainable, Intensive, Biodynamic ...
What's
the beef? All farmers are organic anyway! Letter to the Irish
media.
Mastitis
Control in Organic Herds
Studies
suggest that traditional farming methods are still the best; article by
George Monbiot in The Guardian, 24th August, 2000, www.guardianunlimited.co.uk
. On a planet wallowing in surfeit, people starve because they have
neither the land on which to grow food for themselves nor the money with
which to buy it. Even a Novartis director admits that GM will not feed the
world, to do which, he says, takes political and financial will.
Manure heaped on
organic industry. A now notorious, anti-organic programme was aired on ABC
20/20, in Feb 2000. This is one of the quality replies to the allegations
against the organic industry. http://www.vegsource.com/articles/organics.2020.htm
Iceland
Supermarket launched organics to fail, claims Catherine Sleep, managing
editor of www.just-food.com, (31st
Jan 2001) the authoritive food industry website. Organic project as cause
of Iceland's problems, described by insider as "absolute
unadulterated rubbish".
When they say we
cannot feed the world without chemicals and biotechnology, they are lying,
says Prof. Jules Pretty, Director of the Centre for Environment and
Society at the University of Essex and champion of sustainabe agriculture.
http:// www.members.tripod.com/~ngin/feedtheworld.htm
Behind the
Organic-Industrial Complex by Michael Pollan of the New York Times. Part
of this article refers to the non-organic food industry riding the
coat-tails of the organic industry.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/13/magazine/13ORGANIC.html
?pagewanted=1
The
organic revolution - Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
The
Killing Fields
Stitching
up Time (magazine).
Recognising
and realising the potential of organic agriculture
Can
Organic Farming feed the world? EFRC
Rice
Revolution
Reducing
Food Poverty with Sustainable Agriculture
Backlash
against Organic Food - GM Godfathers and Organicised Crime
Soil
Association action plan
Castro
topples pesticide in Cuba
Organic
farming report – Uk govt., Jan '01 - 37 recommendations
Benefits
of organic food
To
be published. This is a list of subjects I would like to see articles on.
I can, if necessary, write all these myself, over time. I would
prefer however to have our visitors or invited authors write on some of
the subjects or others suggested. I have been volunteered some pieces
already by, amongst others, a leading bio-technologist, a well-known
investigative journalist, a celebrity chef, a historian, an organic
fish-curer and a leading naturopath.
Frank
Newman Turner - the unacknowledged pioneer - soiled by MAFF?
Organic
fascism - by an organic processor.
The Velvet Bean, Mucuna. Now at
least partially covered; see New internationalist, Jan/Feb 2003, p 32, The
Magic Bean by Jules Pretty
Plasticultura
Pollution - Almeria, Spain. Touched on in The Ecologist, Feb 2003, p
36, Blood is thicker than water....by Ros Coward, columnist with The
Guardian.
The
empire fights back - anti-organic backlash. Have done items from time
to time on this in my News. See Archives and
Answering
the organic attacks of Trewavas, Avery, Krebs et al.
Defining
Organic
For
peat's sake, save our bogs.
Are
supermarkets the key to organic expansion?
Andean
Macha – the Viagra Organic Alternative? Search
www.google.com
"Stop
all meetings on BSE"- What did Irish, EU Agricultural Minister, Ray
Mc Sharry, mean by this in Sept. 1990?
The
rain in Spain falls mainly in the mountains. The Spanish wars over
water. Touched on in The Ecologist, Feb 2003, p 36, Blood is thicker than
water....by Ros Coward, columnist with The Guardian.
Are
oganic bodies really interested in mass markets?
MAFFia
tactics destroyed organic farming pioneer, Newman Turner.
Organic
farming - Theology?
The
not-so-lazy, lazy-beds . Have Stuart Trench's description from
Realities of Irish Life, 1868 need to type it up (March 2003).
The
Food Wars.
Flowers
of death - blood on Valentine roses?
Farmer’s
markets – the way forward?
One
man's mission to clean up Ireland's water supply - Walter Graham, American
living in N. Ireland who almost single-handled, persuaded all water
authorities in the North to abandon fluoridation.
Are
supermarkets making a killing with organic food?
Labeling
GM - ABC's refusal, their downfall?
What
is organic? IFOAM call all alternative systems organic!
Is
Organic mono-culture the way to go?
A
fly in the ointment – Mark Purdey’s Warble Fly theory on source of BS
Cuba
spreading Organic Revolution?
The
Vegan organic challenge.
Ireland
Green - a myth?
Does
organic food taste better?
The
use of antibiotics in organic farming.
Grapes
of Wrath? - organic wine makers frustrated over copper sulphate use.
Homeopathy
and organic farming
A load of
manure - who knows how to compost?
The organic
pioneers - Turner, Sykes, Wookey,Rodale, Howard, Balfour, Hills.
Bio-Intensive
Farming - less land, more food, more soil.
Arthur
Young, 18th C. organic agriculturalist.
Should
organic be diluted?
Who is Bruno
Manser?
Garlic
pearls before pigs
A season in
the Valle de la Drome
On the
organic breadline in Germany
The Salmon
of Knowledge
WWOOF give
tongue
The Prince
and the Professor
Sustainable
Art - Tony O'Malley (due June)
Highbrow
organics at Highgrove
Not just a
Pretty face – Jules Pretty elucidates
Getting an
organic roasting in Brittany
Art for
conservation’s sake
Ned Kelly
and the runaway pig
Working on
the right honourable Helen's farm.
Walking on
eggshells - working at Radford Mill
Daring
Darina - Celtic Chef
Walking on
lemons - Andalucia.
Slavery in
Ireland
Munich
Organic Beer Fest
F.Newman
Turner - a MAFF martyr?
Paraquat - a
blast from the past.
Cuba to
spread organic revolution?
Who is Alex
Avery?
"
Roundup is so safe, you can drink it"!!!
The Earth
Goddess and the Garlic Rot.
Famine
Fables - the great lie about the Great Irish Famine
A real Green
Guide to Ireland
What the
Irish Tourist Board doesn't tell you about the Irish environment
AGRICULTURE AND THE WORLD
SUMMIT ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - Grace Maher, September 2002
The World Summit on
Sustainable Development (WSSD) in
Johannesburg was attended by representaives from countries and cultures
from all corners of the world. The summit was
held in three central areas; at the Sandton Convention Centre, where the UN Delegates and some
representatives from non governmental organisations (NGO's) met to discuss
the issues at hand; at Nasrec, members from NGOs, community groups
and members of civil society met to debate the same issues; and at Ubuntu
Village, where culture and arts were represented.
For many organisations the key challenge was to ensure that the focus of the
WSSD remained sustainable development and was not overshadowed by trade
negotiations.
The impetus for the summit was to
build on the principles outlined in Rio ten years ago. The
permanent addition of sustainable development to the agenda
was a significant advancement.
Trade issues attempted to dominate the summit but due to the courageous
steps taken by some progressive governments and the pressure exerted by
NGO's they were not allowed to push the sustainable development agenda to
one side.
The WSSD was attended by approximately 60,000 delegates. The fact that the
summit was held in Africa projected some of the current problems of the
continent to the fore.
The dominant one was the issue of HIV/AIDS and the
poverty and suffering that it is creating in all sectors. The populations
of
HIV/AIDS sufferers in some
communities is as high as 65%. This is having devastating effects in those
areas.
The other backdrop to the summit was the current droughts that are
effecting large parts of the African Continent.This made the issues of
agriculture and water, and access to resources, key topics at the summit.The impact of agricultural
subsidies on developed and developing countries, market access for the products
of the developing world and support for small farmers were all issues which
were covered in relation to the agricultural sector.
In many developing
countries agriculutre is stilll the engine for economic growth. The summit
offered the opportunity for the global community to address key actions on agriculture with a view to sustainability and
reducing poverty and hunger,
protecting biodiverstiy and accesss to resources for small farmers
everywhere. Many developing countries called for an end to the current system
which allows for subsudies in the norh while at the same time such
subsidies are crippling farmers in the developing world. This is viewed by many
as a major barrier to sustainable development.
The issue of genetically modified (GM) food was also a contentious one at the
summit. Many organisations,
like the WWF, felt that the agricultural debates were once again dominated by
corporate agendas trying to push for the widespread introduction of GM
foods. This took place against the outspoken refusal from Zambia to accept
genetically modified food aid from the US. The US has been unrelenting in
putting pressure on countries in Southern Africa to accept GM food in the form
of food aid and through credit assistance.
The fact that countries and people
require food assistance should not be a reason to deprive them of the
choice to obtain non-GM food. The hungry have dignity and the human right to
choose food they believe to be safe for consumption.
The UN World
Heath Organisation and the UN Food and Agriculutre Organisation irresponsibly
advised Southern African countries that GM food is "not likely to present
a human health risk".
The Zambian government with
the suppport of its people and following a national consultation process,
has chosen to reject GM food aid. This decision was taken based on the absence of
national bio-safety regulations
and adequate capacity to carry out reliable risk assessments and the safety
threat to human health. It also took into consideration the
threat of contamination to indigenous seed varieties.
The Zambian policy
decision is fully in line with the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, which
enshrines the soverign right of counties to be informed of, and to take
precautionary decisions on, imports of GM foods. Non GM food aid is readily
available in the US and also from other counties such as Tanzania, Kenya, China and
India who have already offered assistance.
The position taken by the Zambian
government should be applauded as taking a stance aganist multi-billion
dollar biotech companies looking for overseas markets.
Much to the disgust
of many in the audience the US Foreign Secretrary Colin Powell
announced that he deplored the action of counties that rejected US food aid that
contained GM ingredients. Farmers who have experimented
with GM crops expressed disappointment with crop yields and problems with
super-weeds and super-pests which developed after a couple of seasons.
Contamination of seed varieties was also
highlighted
as a problem which is having
negative effects on local seed varieties.
There were very few voices
which stated that they had better returns from the use of GM seed, a lesson
which must be taken to heart by producers
Grace
Maher Johannesburg, September 2002.
Mastitis
control in organic herds
1. Mastitis and mastitis control
strategies. Researchers at Reading University in the UK say there is a need to
develop new mastitis control strategies for organic dairy producers. The
recent, rapid growth of the organic dairy sector in the UK has highlighted
mastitis as one of the key health concerns among organic dairy farmers and the
unsuitability of the Five Point Plan for organic management practices.
A two-year (1997-98) longitudinal mastitis survey of organic dairy
herds in England and Wales suggested that, whilst mastitis risk for organic cows
was no greater than for conventionally managed cows, some herds experienced
problems with high levels of mastitis during the dry period. Overall, organic herds had higher somatic cell count (SCC) levels. The treatment
strategies for organic and conventional herds differed markedly, with
the majority of organic dairy farms using homeopathy as an alternative to antibiotics. Control strategies, however, were similar in both groups
of farms, apart from less emphasis on SCC control in organic herds
compared to the conventionally managed herds. In the light of these findings, the
researchers suggest a new management strategy for a sustainable udder
health promotion in organic dairy herds. For further information, contact
Malla Hovi (m.hovi@reading.ac.uk).Reference: Hovi, M. and Roderick, S. (2000) Mastitis and mastitis
control strategies in organic milk. Cattle Practice 8(3) 259-264.
Messers,
visionaries and organobureaucrats:'This paper asks what happens to
'alternative' social movements like the Irish organic farming movement,
which try to promote sustainable forms of rural development, when they
begin to be incorporated into state policy for farming and the
countryside. Does this provide a context in which farming and food
industry can begin to be 'restructured from below', or does it lead to
'deradicalisation ' of the movement and its ideas? ....institualisation is
often experienced by movement members themselves as a critical, even
highly divisive development, which can result in severe damage to the
movements's core ideology and values.' IOFGA's experience, analysised in
the paper, points to 'the corrosive effects on movement participants of
incorporation of the movement organisations into state corporatist types
of structure.'
The article goes on to conclude that 'institutionalisation will profoundly
affect the movement while leaving the state relatively untouched - that
the organobureaucrats will become another species of state agents and
those who want a 'real alternative, regroup and start all over again'.
Defining
Farming Terms
There is some confusion in
the terms describing different kinds of farming today. Before the 1950’s,
"farming" was largely applied to all agricultural activity
whether it was practised on a prairie or a peasant scale. However, since
then, various new terms have evolved and it may be useful to
clarify, as much as possible, what is understood by them.
1. Traditional farming
This is the type of farming
carried out throughout the world for millennia past. It is characterised by
self-sufficiency, age-old traditions of husbandry and natural methods of
fertilizing (e.g. recycling animal and vegetable waste) weed and pest
control. On the whole, early, traditional farming was environmentally
friendly and sustainable but there were periods when mistakes were made
and over-use and deforestation resulted. Some desertification, as in the
Sahara, the Middle East, Peru and the US are examples of such early
environmental disasters.
2. Modern farming
Modern farming, as we know
it, began to develop, particularly in the
West, from the 1920’s. It is typified by a more intensive use of land
and buildings, mechanisation and the use of artificial chemical
fertilizers and weed and pest control. Labour was increasingly being
replaced by machines and chemicals. Specialisation in crops and animals
became the norm and a reliance built up on bought-in chemical and
processed inputs. This was farming becoming industrialised and large
companies developed to stimulate and supply its needs.
3. Factory
farming
In the last half of the 20th
Century certain areas of modern farming have become even more intensive
and farm animals are now being mass-produced in industrial conditions. The
most extreme example would be poultry where in some units millions of
birds are kept in small, individual cages. Pigs are probably the next most
intensively produced farm animal with units of hundreds of thousands (and
in the US, millions) housed in factory-like buildings. Beef and other farm
animals are also produced in large feed lots and in slatted-floor housing.
High-protein rations (including until recently, meat and bone meal)
artificial hormones and antibiotics are fed to improve productivity.
4.Biotech farming
This controversial type of
farming has developed mainly in the last 20 years. The technology is
designed to increase agricultural productivity by genetically engineering
or manipulating (GM ) genes in plants sometimes by adding animal genes. GM
crops have been developed to be resistant to specific herbicides and
pests. In one case seed was designed so that it could not germinate the
following year. Although millions of acres are grown it seems as if the
AgBiotech industry is in trouble. Governments are insisting on labelling
or in some cases even banning GM foods, farmers are angry as productivity
and profit targets have not been met and public and scientific distrust of
the technology is growing.
5. Sustainable farming
This is a term that needs
some standardising. Organic and sustainable are often used
interchangeably. Yet organic can be unsustainable in certain
circumstances, and sustainable need not be organic. Sustainable
farming as described by Prof. Pretty *seems to be emerging as the
standard explanation of the term. In many respects, as he describes it,
it is similar to organic farming. Sustainable agriculture encourages
the recycling of natural wastes as manures and encourages appropriate
technology, such as surface cultivation, rather than deep ploughing. It is
different from organic farming in that it doesn’t exclude artificial
fertilisers and chemicals but attempts instead to optimise their use.
Recent reports show that thousands of communities and millions of acres
are now involved and are showing dramatic increases in productivity
combined with increasing soil fertility and an improved environment.
* Prof.Jules Pretty is
Director of the Centre for Environment and Society at the Univ. of Essex.
A world expert on sustainable agriculture he is the author of a world-wide
report launched in Jan ’01.
6. Biointensive
Farming
Biointensive gardening,
sometimes called mini-farming is a combination of Irish lazy-bed, 19th
C. French raised-bed, and Chinese traditional methods of farming. It
claims enormous outputs from a very small area - enough to feed a family
from a few hundred square feet - whilst building uo the soi.More about
this method developed by American, John Jeavon, based on the work of
English gardener, Alan Chadwick at; www.growbiointensive.org
7. Vegan
organic farming
www.veganvillage.co.uk
Promotes vegan organic farming.. "Can’t feed two populations,
animals and people…" they argue. Vegans criticise extensive,
organic, animal husbandry systems as, "disastrous" and
"irresponsible". It takes, they say, 85% of UK farmland to feed
the one billion animals slaughtered there each year.
8. Biodynamic
farming
Basically the
same as organic farming but with a more esoteric and philosophical base.
Part of the anthroposophic teaching of Austrian, Rudolf Steiner, it
purports to help the health-giving forces of nature with special
methods and preparations. Steiner admirably emphasised the absurdity of
agricultural economics being determined by people who have never farmed. www.biodynamics.com
9. Organic farming
Organic farmingdeveloped in
modern times as a response to what was perceived to be the polluting of
our food supply by modern and factory farming methods and the ensuing
degradation of the environment with chemical and other by-products of the
industry.
ORGANIC
FARMING BACKGROUND
It is difficult, and perhaps
not that important, to indicate a definite point where the modern organic
farming movement began. But there were certainly people who can be
identified as being innovators and leaders. Organic farming owes more to
traditional farming than anything else. It could be said that organic
farming is traditional farming with a modern philosophical head and
mechanical technology. So it is reasonable therefore to say that organic
farming, in its essence, is traditional farming and therefore can be traced
back to prehistoric times.
As with the other types of
farming there is some confusion about terminology.
Organic farming is often
perceived by its critics to be a regressive back-to-nature type of
activity. The image still persists of hippy drop-outs retreating to a
remote crumbling cottages with impossibly overgrown acres armed with
little other than a John Seymour, grow-your-own book and a conviction that
modern society was crazy.
And the image is not
altogether incorrect. Many thousands of young people did leave their
mainly urban and privileged backgrounds in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s
to forge their own way in the countryside. Many of them subsequently
contributed substantially to the modern organic movement and, although
this might embarrass them, they should perhaps be considered the pioneers
from which a large and complex revolutionary agricultural movement has
grown. Statues may not be in order yet but perhaps they will still come!
For some the subsistence way
was satisfying enough but others went a different route, perhaps a more
missionary one, growing and rearing more intensively and selling their
produce in markets and shops. This led in turn to the development of
larger organic farms and horticultural units, retailers, wholesalers and
distributors. In parallel, groups, committees and societies were formed,
some of which became certification bodies to regulate and guarantee the
quality of their members’ produce. The growth rate in the last ten years
has been phenomenal increasing by up to 40% per annum and sales
value has now reached approx. $50 billion world-wide.
It is not a little
astonishing that organic food is still regarded by some, especially in
conventional farming circles and government departments, as marginal
niche-market stuff. It is not regarded as being scientific or capital
intensive . It is hard not to conclude that they currently have their
heads in the sand but that, in the not too distant future, they will have
to follow as more organically progressive countries like Austria, Cuba,
Denmark, Sweden etc.
Although "Organic
" is now an officially recognised term enshrined in law in the US,
the EU and some other countries there is still considerable confusion
about what it means.
In many ways modern
organic farming resembles traditional farming and is often confused
with it. This is perhaps understandable because at times there were
different messages coming from the organic movement itself. In fact its
critics constantly refer to it as " back-to-nature farming"
implying that it is a regression to traditional peasant farming. It does
rely largely on the same principles of recycling animal and crop waste and
natural methods of controlling pests and weeds. The differences are, that
organic farming consciously recognises the fragility of the environment
and the dangers of modern chemical and other inputs and works to exclude
them from its farm practices and find natural alternatives.
Contrary to what its
opponents sometimes suggest, organic farming is not in the least
anti-science and looks to biological science particularly for assistance
in dealing with fertility, crop pests and diseases. Although research
institutes in Europe have done much pioneering work and several new
centres are coming on-stream, Cuba probably has more scientific resources
employed in organic farming research than the rest of the world combined.
It had to - otherwise there could have been famine back in the '90s when
it was largely abandoned by its major supporter, the USSR.
Good traditional farming
practice involved knowing your soil, plants and animals well and the
nutrient, shelter and health requirements needed to keep all in balance.
The astute farmer worked at building up fertility, i.e.the organic matter,
including living organisms such as soil-producing worms in the earth, and
keeping down animal and plant diseases. Crop rotation e.g. pasture,
followed by cereals, followed by vegetables was one of the best tools of
the trade. Fertiliser was supplied by recycling animal and vegetable
wastes, legume crops, rock minerals and extra soils such as marl.
When he did the job well he
could pass on the farm "in good heart" to the next generation.
Traditional farming began to
give way to a more intensive, industrialised agriculture about 70 years
ago as artificial chemical fertilisers, mechanisation and chemical weed
and pest control began to be developed.
Millennia-old skills were
abandoned practically overnight as the race to modernise began.
Whats
the beef?
Dear Sir
Every time I hear Bord Bia referring to us as "The Food
Island", and the Food Safety Authority of Ireland declaring our food
to be safe, I squirm. I marvel too at their ineffable cheek and the
enormity of the budgets they consume.
We may be the largest exporter of food within the EU but we have
little right today to trade on our former reputation as a
producer of clean, safe food.
Their marketing is hollow and transparent - and not only to me.I talk to
many Europeans who tell me they go out of their way not to eat
Irish food: a complete reversal of how it used to be back in the 1960s and
before.
There is a way however of turning the situation around, restoring our
reputation and creating considerable wealth and jobs in the process - a
rapid and extensive adoption of organic farming methods.
The fascinating thing is that organic farming
is nothing new to us in Ireland and comparatively it should be a doddle
for us to implement.
To explain: on my father’s mixed farm,
in the 1950’s and19 60’s we produced wonderful, healthy food without
reliance on chemical fertilisers, pesticides, herbicides or fungicides.
Crop and animal rotations, farm-yard manure and cultivation were our
natural farming aids. We ate our delicious produce with complete
confidence. Mouth-watering, Golden Wonder potatoes (so aptly named),
generously dolloped with butter, succulent meats and other vegetables
fresh out of the garden, graced our table. Relatives returning to the
still-rationed UK
loaded their luggage with presents of these wonderful foods, particularly
the bacon, sausages (Dennys Gold Label - they were real sausages then)
eggs and butter.
In the 60’s and 70’s
things changed and we became intensive users of agri-chemicals. Like
almost everyone else we were quickly attracted to them because they were
so convenient and easy to use and labour was becoming expensive. But we
knew in our bones it was wrong – we could see that we were poisoning our
produce and our environment.
For example, it was frightening how a herbicide, paraquat, burnt a field to the ground in preparation for potato
harvesting; we turned a blind eye to the probability of dangerous residues
in and on the potatoes.
We were, we claimed, subject to irresistible
economic and advertising pressures.
We dealt with the
problem badly. We convinced/deluded ourselves that the government and agri-industry
knew what they were doing and that therefore it was safe to sell our bulk
produce to consumers.
How wrong we were!
However, we provided for our personal qualms by keeping a few free-range animals and a near-organic
kitchen garden far away from the factory-farming sheds, the hedge-less and
poisoned fields.
This is the sense in which I
say all farmers are organic.
They know their onions! They know what's good
and bad practice and they know how to look after themselves.
Many farmers don't eat themselves what they mass-produce.
Of course it is utterly
hypocritical and contemptible. But farmers are not alone, are not the only
players in all this.
Governments and consumers demanded cheaper and cheaper food. This was
delivered but the real costs were hidden.The environmental and human
health problems created by these poitico/economic policies over the last
50 years were ignored.
Personally I want to
apologise to consumers – I meant no harm - I was caught up in
bigger things I didn't really understand at the time.
I now know better and have changed.
And I would
like to make up by passing on what I have learned.
I would urge shoppers to seek out organic food as much as possible - if not for
their own sakes
then for their childrens'. Organic and locally-produced would be the
ideal.
Try to grow your own if you can and support the ever-increasing farmers'
markets.
Demand safe
food through your politicians, your community organisations and your
shops. It is after all a basic human right.
Be aware of the
counter-propaganda of agri-industry and bureaucracies that have
become powerful through the servicing of industrialised agriculture.
They know the trends better than anybody. They see that organic farming is
growing enormously, in the US and western Europe and poses a considerable threat to their
share prices, indeed to their very existence.
And in consequence, they are fighting dirty and pitching large resources
into ant-organic and pro-GM campaigns to maintain their dominance.
But they
will only succeed if you remain indifferent.
Use your considerable consumer power to resist them and demand healthy, affordable food as your
basic human right.
Then perhaps some day we
will again see visitors to Ireland pack their suitcases with healthy,
delicious Irish produce.
Then, and only then, will we be entitled to call
ourselves, without a trace of guilt, "The Food Island" .
Yours etc
Counterblast - the
cynical BBC TV programme that attempted to rubbish the organic movement.
My letter to the Beeb.
Dear Ms Doak (of the BBC)
I received your letter of 9th Feb last week.
I find it very surprising that you justify the programme because it
".....air(s)views that are either normally misrepresented or
under-represented in the mainstream media."
On the contrary, if anything, the view presented by Mr Bates is one that
is over-represented. To many it was all too-familiar territory. We hear
the same arguments constantly from farmers, their politicians, the farming
press, the GM food industry, scientists and indeed from all areas of the
mainstream media. Until now their arguments were fragmented, vicious,
incoherent, and even anti-scientific( yes; it constantly amazes me how
illogical scientists can be when they and their funds are threatened);
they hadn't got their act together, possibly because they felt that
organic farming was only a marginal activity that could be side-swiped out
of existence or ignored altogether.
It is a measure of the success of the organic movement that the vested
interests are now being forced to confront it with all their resources -
it is fast becoming a mainstream competitor. There is also a strong
suspicion that the GM industry, smarting heavily from its recent setbacks,
is deeply involved in slandering organic farming because they see this as
a more productive, longer term, stategy than immediately trying to stuff
their GM products down reluctant Euro-consumers' throats.
You have to hand it to them now though, because they are finally getting
it together.
And they are doing it very professionally: they can afford it .
There have been a whole series of attacks in the media in recent times.The
Counterblast programme is a good example of this effective if
Goebbels-like propaganda. The ABC 20/20 John Stossel programme in early
Feb. was another attempted hatchet-job on the organic sector - its
principal contributor has since been completely discredited.
The sad thing about all of this is that, to a very large extent, it is
a done deed that organic farming is going to be the main type of European
farming in the future - eg see Agenda 2000 proposals. It is depressing
that the agri-industries of countries like the UK and Ireland are
prepared, obstinately Canute-like, to fight the inevitable to the bitter
end. This is a terrible waste of all our energies. On the other hand,
major food-producing countries like Dennmark are planning a national
organic industry and considering how best to capitalise on the huge
opportunities presented.
With regard to the BBC's role in this affair I would think that you have
allowed yourself to be used in this propaganda campaign and permitted a
programme to be aired of monumental, mischievous misinformation.
Common justice can simply be served by allowing the organic movement an
equal airing of their case.
How about it?
Thank you.
Jim O'Connor, West Cork.
GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BULL -
June 6th 1999 - published in the Irish Times and several other papers
Dear Sir
Astute food-producing countries like Denmark are racing to become
organic (and thus GM free) to meet the astronomical European demand for
clean food.
Ireland should be doing the same.
Instead we have our bio-industry and agricultural education establishments
(Sutton Castle, GM hearing, last week) doing their utmost to kill a
potential golden goose. "Commercial organic farming is the greatest
threat to bio-diversity.", says Prof. Whittaker, Maynooth. His
argument is based on " one study" that says organic production
levels are 50% lower than conventional agriculture and thus requires
correspondingly more land.
I vehemently disagree.
Contrary to the professor's contention, output levels in organic farming
can match and exceed that of chemical farming - eg see Teagasc, Johnstown
Castle, recent report,. And where they don't, decent research funds would
undoubtedly raise productivity.There are many more studies - I'd be glad
to cite them if requested.
But, at a practical level, take even my own humble case; I grow garlic,
organically, about 40,000 plants, and get yields over 100% more than the
European commercial average. Furthermore, a study I made on potatoes
shows, remarkably, that modern agriculture still hasn't equalled the
output levels achieved in Ireland before the 1840's Famine.
Chemical farming has left us a legacy of a degraded environment, mountains
and lakes of surplus produce, factory farming of animals, decreased
employment and profits in agriculture, and, of course, food contamination.
Directly add the costs of these effects to our conventional food (which we
pay for indirectly anyway) and we'll see the real price of food.
The men in white coats are scraping the bottom of the barrel for arguments
to bolster a losing case. Again, a pro-GM scientist (Conference on GM
food, Skibbereen, Feb '99 ) said - almost with a giggle! - that;
"....organic potatoes are poisonous and you organic farmers here
should throw them all away".
Nonsense! And I told him so. His experiments lacked even the most basic of
controls. As for the ridiculous notion of being poisoned by organic
potatoes; as an act of commemoration two years ago I ate a pre-Famine diet
of organic potatoes and mostly buttermilk for six months. It's the
simplest and healthiest diet possible - recently confirmed by a US diet
study.
Organic farming is good for the environment, for the economy (huge import
savings as well), for rural employment but above all for the health of our
people. Substract these benefits from the cost of organic produce and
you'll see the true value of healthy food.
Far from bowing to the dictates and mega-buck research funds of a
discredited bio-engineering industry (see Ecologist, Sept/Oct, '98 - The
Monsanto Files) we should follow Denmark's example and start our own race
to be first in the fast-developing organic industry.
Chemical and GM farming is the real threat to the environment and
bio-diversity - not organic farming.
Jim O'Connor
Waterfall,
Beara,
Co.Cork.
Tel 027 70717
6th June '99
Back
to top
|
|
|